Saturday, December 28, 2019

The Distinction Of Ethics And Morality - 1307 Words

The Distinction Of Ethics And Morality: The use of the words ethics and morality are often confused with each other especially these are commonly used in Philosophy and other related fields. This paper will discuss the distinction between these two concepts. According to Gammel (2007), the difference between the terms morality and ethics has a very thin line particularly in the daily language. Adding to this confusion is that other philosophical resources and materials use the terms interchangeably but some provide a definite distinction in between them. The word ethics is derived from the Greek word ‘ethos’ that refers to the habits, mores, and customs of the people. On the other hand, morality comes from the Latin word ‘moralis’ that signifies nearly the same definition like ethics which was introduced by the philosopher Cicero as the counterpart to the Greek word ethos. To put clarity on this matter, the author Gammel assumed that the uniform definition of morality points out to customs wherein these are the rules of do’s and don’ts that are accepted and shared as the governing standard and regulations in their community or society. These are often the accepted basis of life lessons which are not needed to be questioned on a rational way. On the contrary, ethics is the reflection philosophically towards these rules derived from morality and the manners of living together including the habits, customs, culture, and tradition of the people. This is very similar to theShow MoreRelatedEthics: Moral Absolutes Essay1180 Words   |  5 PagesEthics 3.1 1. Why are Christian ethics and theology inseparable? What did Francis Schaeffer mean when he said that not all things are the same to God? Christian ethics is inseparable from theology because it is grounded in the character of God. Francis Schaeffer said that not all things are the same to God and means that God exists and has a character, but not all things are the same to him. Some things conform to His character, and some are opposed to his character. 2. What did Schaeffer concludeRead MoreEthics And Health Care Professions867 Words   |  4 PagesThe field of ethics includes the broad study of social morality along with reflections on its norms and practices. Ethical theory and moral philosophy refer to philosophical reflection on morality. Morality can be best defined as principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Philosophical ethics and health care professions focuses on learning what philosophy is and how it contributes to human history, culture, and autonomy, learning how that contributionRead MoreEthics of Billions Behind Bars707 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿Ethics of Billions Behind Bars Louis Therouxs Billions Behind Bars (2008) provides live footage of San Quentin prison near San Francisco. The film explores ethical issues concerning law and morality, although it does not attempt to solve the issue of Applied Ethics, or how moral problems can be resolved (Banks, 2012). Although Theroux does not forcefully articulate an editorial viewpoint, his sparse technique elucidates the ambiguity of morality. The opening scene makes a clear distinction betweenRead MoreThe Divine Command Theory : Capital Punishment And Abortion Essay1128 Words   |  5 PagesThe Divine Command Theory is the assertion in ethics that an action is morally right if, and only if, it conforms to God’s will. This premise ties together morality and religion in a manner that seems expected, since it provides a solution to arguments about moral relativism and the objectivity of ethics. On the other hand, in Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions whether something is right because God commands it, or whether God commands it because it is right. The ethical implications of theRead MoreEthics And Morality Are The Same Thing812 Words   |  4 PagesWhen discussing ethics, people often think ethics and morality are the same thing. But in order to understand ethical leadership, it can be beneficial to view these two concepts differently. One of the most important ethical philosophers of modern times has been John Rawls, who made a clear distinction between comprehensive moral systems and less comprehensive systems. The distinction can help better understand the idea of ethical leadership. To Rawls, the two differ in the following manner: †¢ ComprehensiveRead MoreEvolution Of Society s Social Values925 Words   |  4 Pagesseriously wrong.† (Shlichta). How civilization views and interprets ethics and morals changes as we advance with time; the importance of the morality is at a decline, and will continue on a downward spiral as civilization advances. What are morals? How can one define the meaning of morality? Often the answers of those questions could easily be found online. Dictionaries would define Morality as the â€Å"principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior.† (The OxfordRead MoreMax Weber s Politics As A Vocation860 Words   |  4 Pagestraditional morality. An ethic of ultimate ends is not realistic or plausible for the field of politics, particularly when it is followed steadfastly. An ethic of responsibility is more compatible with politics, as it allows the response to a situation to be determined by the circumstances rather than inflexible rules, while still maintaining accountability for one’s own actions. This flexibility is most necessitated by the politicians use of violence. There is a fallacy that an â€Å"ethic of ultimateRead More Ethical and Philosophical Questions about Value and Obligation977 Words   |  4 Pagesand Philosophical Questions abo ut Value and Obligation I Recall the distinction between metaethics and normative ethics. Normative ethics deals with substantial ethical issues, such as, What is intrinsically good? What are our moral obligations? Metaethics deals with philosophical issues about ethics: What is value or moral obligation? Are there ethical facts? What sort of objectivity is possible in ethics? How can we have ethical knowledge? Recall, also, the fundamental dilemmaRead MoreDescriptive vs Normative Statements1298 Words   |  6 PagesQuestion 1 To explain the distinction between Descriptive and Normative Statements one first has to understand the difference between Descriptive and Normative Ethics. Descriptive ethics primarily describes people’s moral beliefs, claims and behaviors. This form of ethics is studied primarily by psychologist, sociologist and anthropologist. With Normative ethics we deal with the attempt to discover what actions are in fact right or wrong, good or bad and what it takes to be a moral or immoral personRead MoreThe Connection Between Law And Morality1718 Words   |  7 PagesII. WHAT IS MORALITY? â€Å"Law would not be really imperative, we know, unless behind the sword of the magistrate, the bulk of mankind felt the weight of social obligation, the irresistible burden of custom, of immemorial tradition, and the like, a social, and even a religious sanctity. The connection of law and morality has been much discussed ever since the revival of the scientific study of jurisprudence, but the question is not yet, and perhaps never will be, settled. Every variety of opinion

Friday, December 20, 2019

My Philosophy Of Education How We Must Educate Our Children

Philosophy of Education How we must educate our children in Arkansas, as well as in the United States, has changed over the past twenty years since I began a career in education. Educating our children has become a data-driven task, in which high-stakes testing is the driving force requiring our students to compete with children from countries around the globe. State testing assessments drive curricula and make students, teachers, and principals more accountable for what is happening in the classroom than ever before. Education is focused on the individual child, and there is a greater push for parent involvement. Despite what we see and read in the media, research indicates teacher job satisfaction is still high. Many educators are†¦show more content†¦This experience has changed my philosophy of education. I first strive to build relationships with my students; I do lose some instruction time due to this endeavor, but when my students know I care about and that I believe in them they start to believe in themselves. My philosophy of education begins and ends in the belief that all children can learn (Gunzenhauser, 2012). I believe the way we teach has changed, children come to us with needs that we struggle to understand. Students don’t always come to school ready to learn. Many children lack support systems and must overcome obstacles. They have struggles at ages they are not equipped to deal with. Therefore, we must change the way we approach education. We must take a hard look at our students’ needs and meet those needs before we can teach them. These students may need our help with food one out of every four children are living with food insecurity (Food insecurity | child trends, 2014). Some students need school appropriate clothes, supplies, social skills, more time or health care. These children may need counseling, or may need to be placed in a safer environment. They may need to be placed in a more challenging curriculum or need to be evaluat ed for special education or a 504. Regardless, we must focus on the needs of the whole child before we can ever hope to teach them what they need to learn to be contributing citizens for

Thursday, December 12, 2019

King of the Castle Essay Example For Students

King of the Castle Essay Willy Russell, the writer of many plays, such as, Blind Scouse, King of the Castle, Lies, Educating Rita and the very famous, Blood Brothers, was born in Whiston in 1947. The opening of Blood Brothers was performed at a London theatre in 1983. Blood Brothers was written as a play, but in 1988, Bill Kenwright opened a musical version of the original play, to perform on the West End. He added fun and moving songs, such as Tell me its not true, Marilyn Monroe, That Guy plus many more. Blood Brothers has been around for about 24 years now and it is still going strong and is very popular. At the time that Blood Brothers was written, Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister and at these times there was a lot of class division. The reason for this was direct taxes, that people were paying, were cut and therefore indirect taxes were raised. This resulted in a high unemployment of over three million people. This idea of class divisions is well portrayed in the musical. Blood Brothers was set in Liverpool on a council estate and also on an upper-class housing estate. The narrative of the play is about a set of twins, named Mickey and Edward, who have been separated at birth due to the fact that their birth mother, Mrs Johnstone, couldnt afford to keep them both. She was a cleaner for an upper class family and as a result of finding out that her boss couldnt have children, she agreed to give her one of her twins at birth. One twin, Mickey, is brought up on the council estate and the other twin, Edward, is brought up on the upper-class housing estate. They lead two totally different lives yet somehow manage to meet and become the best of friends. As they grow, we follow their story of love, hate, luck and misfortune until eventually, the worst happens and they are both killed. The scene in which Mickey and his siblings are playing with their friend Linda, is the chosen scene. It is very playful and comes across to the audience in a humorous manner. There are many themes in this scene as a lot of action is taking place. Superstition is extremely visible in this scene, with chants such as.  But you know that if you cross your fingers, and if you count from one to ten, you can get up off the ground again.  This shows that the children know it is all just a game. It is make believe and unreal. They think no real damage can come of this, but can it? Willy Russell also, purposefully, jumps back seven years, as seven is a lucky number. Some people may believe in superstition more than others. If you are an unlucky person you may be more superstitious than a person who experiences a lot of luck. Many people believe it has something to do with class. Throughout the play we see that Mrs Johnstone is very superstitious whereas Mrs Lyons isnt. In this case the class division shows that if you are used to being let down by the law, jobs and day to day life then you are more likely to believe in luck as you want and are in need of it more. Although if you have everything you could possibly want and are happy with your lifestyle, like someone living on an upper-class housing estate, you are less likely to believe in luck, as you dont need it. Therefore, seven years ago, when the twins mother, Mrs Johnstone, gave birth to them, she made a deal with Mrs Lyons. She was bribed into giving up one of her newborns due to the fact that Mrs Lyons wanted a child.  If either twin learns that he was once a pair, they shall both die, immediately.  Again this shows Mrs Johnstone believes in superstition and it seems she has passed it on to her children. Also, during certain scenes we see the narrator wandering round both Mrs Lyons and Mrs Johnstone in an eerie way. One of the narrators songs Shoes upon the table is all about superstition. It pin points all the unlucky things that have occurred and creates tension as we see how unlucky both the Johnstones and the Lyons get. .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d , .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .postImageUrl , .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d , .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:hover , .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:visited , .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:active { border:0!important; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:active , .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u9a51c3462ad83e156c2fff0c45183b6d:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Oranges an autobiographical novel EssayForeshadowing is also shown in this scene. It is shown when Mickey gets shot and Linda stands in front of him. In the scene, when Sammy shoots at Mickey, he says, Youre dead, you know y are I got y standin near that car, and Linda replies with, but when y did, his hands were hid, behind his back, his fingers crossed and so hes not. This lets us see the future in a way as it gets across to the audience that she clearly likes him when they are just young children. We see this more clearly throughout the play. As the scene goes on, another theme is introduced. Class divisions. Russell gets across the idea of class divisions by setting his characters in a particular place. Also when Mickey, Linda and Edward are shooting at a target, Edward is told to say certain things to a policeman. The way in which the policeman treats Mr Lyons is the total opposite to how he treats Mrs Johnstone. When he enters the Lyons house, things such as, it was more of a prank really, and Make sure you keep him with his own kind, are said, showing that the two classes, both upper and working, are seen as entirely different people, almost as if they live in two completely separate worlds. We see the policeman saying to Mrs Johnstone, you dont wanna end up in court again, do y? and well, therell be no more bloody warnings from now on, creating the effect that you should almost expect people from the working classes to behave in a specific way. It is also showing that the Johnstones are often involved with the police .